The discussion surrounding the tracking of stock market transactions made by politicians raises critical ethical concerns about transparency and accountability in political finances. Critics argue that current self-reporting mechanisms are inadequate, allowing politicians to make trades based on privileged information without sufficient oversight. The recent introduction of ETFs like NANC and KRUZ highlights a growing interest in capitalizing on these trades by allowing regular investors to mirror politicians' commercial activities. However, the distinction between 'capital' and 'Capitol' indicates a need for clearer communication in these discussions. There are lingering questions regarding the speed and accuracy of real-time trade tracking, signaling a demand for more robust systems in place to capture and report such transactions effectively.