The post discusses the competition and ethical implications surrounding the discovery of DNA's structure, focusing on the contributions and overshadowed efforts of Rosalind Franklin, who played a crucial role in the discovery of DNA's double helix but was largely overlooked and underappreciated. It addresses the historical context of scientific achievements and how recognition and credit can often be unequally distributed. The comment reflects a sentiment of fatigue about continually discussing Franklin in this context, suggesting a possible desire for broader recognition of multiple contributors to science.