The post discusses the claim that ambiguous images can offer psychological insights, referencing the challenges and biases associated with interpreting statistical correlations in psychological research. Commenters express skepticism about the robustness of the findings, particularly concerning the interpretation of several ambiguous images related to personality traits. Concerns regarding the misuse of statistical analysis, potential spurious correlations, and the proper adjustment for multiple comparisons are highlighted. Additionally, the merits and drawbacks of using ambiguous images (like Rorschach tests) in psychological evaluation are debated, with a call for a more nuanced understanding of 'empirical support'.