The ongoing debate around return-to-office (RTO) policies in the U.S. highlights a significant concern regarding potential brain drain. Many employees, particularly those with sought-after skills, are opting out of in-person work, which may lead to a talent exodus toward private sectors offering better compensation and flexibility. Commenters express skepticism over the claim that a reduced workforce in government can automatically result in greater efficiency, citing that efficiency must be evaluated based on output, not merely headcount. There is also concern about the long-term impacts of these policies, suggesting that only the less mobile workforce may remain, potentially dampening overall productivity and effectiveness. In addition, the stress of virtual meetings as opposed to in-person work is cited as a factor contributing to mental fatigue, questioning the viability of remote interactions as replacements for traditional work environments.