The discussion revolves around the tactical reasoning behind the use of archers in battle and why volley firing may not have been a common practice historically. Key points include the discipline required for troops to withstand arrow volleys, the difference in effectiveness against organized versus disorganized armies, and the physical demands of shooting warbows. The comments suggest that while the author claims no evidence supports the idea of volley fire, the practicality of synchronized firing during a charge seems plausible. Critique of the article points to inconsistencies and the need for more detailed evidence to support assertions made.