The post and comments explore the complex relationship between AI, creativity, copyright, and the implications of AI-generated art on traditional intellectual property laws. A significant debate exists regarding whether generative AI should be viewed as a tool (like copiers) or as an artist itself, with suggestions that current copyright frameworks are insufficient for the realities of AI use in creative fields. Discussions include the moral obligations of distributing wealth derived from AI based on contributions from living and deceased artists alike, and the need for a balanced approach in legal regulations that encourage innovation without undermining creators. Key points include calls for clearer copyright laws specifically addressing AI, concerns about how AI models are trained on existing works, and the societal implications of treating art merely as capital.