This post discusses the use of AMP (Accelerated Mobile Pages) in emails and presents arguments against interactive email formats. Key reasons include the need for emails to be immutable records, ensuring users can always access the original content without changes. Many users prefer static, self-contained emails that do not rely on external links or dynamic content that may become inaccessible. There’s also a debate between technical and political objections to AMP, with some users advocating for the development of better communication standards over email. Further, while AMP tried to enhance user experience and boost SEO, its implementation complexity and poor adoption rates led to its decline. Current communications tools like Slack are proposed as possible replacements, emphasizing the need for a unified protocol for modern interactions beyond static emails. The post highlights ongoing challenges related to finding effective communication standards that prioritize interoperability and versatility.