Criticism of Go channels as synchronization primitives

Viewed 49
The post discusses criticisms about the use of channels in the Go programming language for synchronization. It highlights a semi-formal rule within Google against exporting channels in function signatures due to their complexity in large codebases. The opinion shared emphasizes that while channels are better than condition variables for inter-thread communication, traditional synchronization methods like mutexes are simpler and more performant. Additionally, there is a comparison with Rust's async model, which reportedly avoids common pitfalls associated with Go channels, such as deadlocks. Further suggestions for managing channels in Go include sending close messages to goroutines and utilizing Context instances to monitor state changes effectively.
0 Answers