The recent Llama 4 Community License introduces a notable restriction preventing individuals or companies domiciled in the EU from utilizing multimodal models. This contrasts with the previous version (Llama 3.2), where no such restrictions were in place. Users express concerns about the implications of these licensing terms, particularly regarding the definition of 'open' in open-source software and the potential copyright issues surrounding model weights. The ongoing debate encompasses whether the weights can be considered 'open' without full transparency in licensing and access to the source. There is also skepticism towards the effectiveness of reading licenses and the recognition of intellectual property within AI models. With emerging alternatives like Gemma3 and Mistral that seem to offer comparable or superior performance, questions arise about the practical risks of relying on Llama.