In a recent ruling, a three-judge panel from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals found that Grant County District Attorney Jim Carpenter's actions constituted a significant infringement on a woman's Fourth Amendment rights, yet upheld the decision to grant him qualified immunity (QI). This ruling highlights the ongoing debate surrounding qualified immunity, which shields government officials from being held liable for unconstitutional actions unless a prior court ruling specifically established that the action was unconstitutional. Many commenters expressed frustration, arguing that qualified immunity enables abuse of power by police and prosecutors. Moreover, the case raises questions about accountability and the extent of protection under QI, especially concerning privacy violations. The implications of this ruling may foster further inquiries into the mechanisms of accountability for law enforcement officials and could influence future civil lawsuits.