Consider Rexx for Scripting

Viewed 45
The discussion surrounding Rexx as a scripting language reveals a blend of admiration for its historical usage and skepticism about its relevance in today's programming landscape. Many users fondly recall their experiences with Rexx, particularly in integrated environments like the Amiga, praising its ease of use and English-like syntax. However, a common sentiment is that modern alternatives such as Python and Lua have eclipsed Rexx due to broader ecosystem support and functionality. Users note that the once strong integrations with applications have diminished, diminishing Rexx's practicality. There are questions about the availability and adoption of open-source Rexx interpreters, with comparisons drawn against more widely embraced languages. The nostalgia for Rexx coexists with a recognition of the evolution of programming languages towards more structured paradigms, raising inquiries about Rexx's adaptability and contemporary utility as a scripting tool.
0 Answers