Criticism and developments surrounding the Deno runtime

Viewed 29
The recent discussion surrounding Deno highlights a significant shift in its direction that has disenchanted many in the developer community. Initially marketed as a fresh, safe alternative to Node.js, Deno has recently incorporated Node.js compatibility, a move criticized by some as a departure from its original promise. Users express frustration that Deno appears to prioritize VC-backed services and features that align with investor expectations over maintaining its innovative groundwork. Critics argue that this compromise diminishes Deno's unique selling point and fosters a sense of insecurity regarding the project's longevity, as it heavily relies on external funding. Despite the criticism, supporters acknowledge that enhanced Node compatibility could potentially unlock new use cases, though many remain skeptical about its pipeline and overall product focus. The situation presents a challenge for Deno to redefine its value proposition amidst growing competition and shifting developer preferences, and raises questions about the sustainability of its business model.
0 Answers