Recent research challenges the pervasive belief that killing inherently leads to moral injury for soldiers. The study published in 'Armed Forces and Society' indicates that many soldiers do not experience moral injury when engaging in combat, suggesting that the act of killing may not be perceived as 'unnatural' as widely thought. Comments from readers highlight a variety of perspectives about morality in warfare, suggesting that individual backgrounds, societal influences, and the context of the combat play significant roles in how killings are perceived by soldiers. Some express skepticism towards the universality of moral injury, while others argue that there are variations based on a soldier's experiences and upbringing. The dialogue points to a deep societal misunderstanding of human nature concerning violence and historical context.