Recent discussions emerged surrounding a novel surgical procedure that involves using a patient's canine tooth to create a scaffolding for an optical lens, which is then transplanted into the eye. This technique sparks curiosity about its efficacy compared to existing methods like the Boston Keratoprosthesis, with some commenters expressing skepticism regarding its relevance and medical soundness. Conversations also ponder the ingenuity behind conceiving such a surgery, reinforcing the notion that this is an example of resourceful innovation with a sci-fi flair. However, many feel apprehensive about the nature and ethical considerations of using human body parts for such procedures. While it embodies a unique approach to addressing vision loss, its predominance in contemporary medical practice is questioned given historical context and existing alternatives.