The discussion around persuasion methods for engineering managers reveals a complex landscape of interactions within tech organizations. The key points from the comments highlight a divide between the ideal principles of leadership and the realities faced by engineering managers. Some commenters advocate for active listening as a fundamental method to establish rapport, while others criticize the notion of manipulation through persuasion, emphasizing honesty and clarity in communication as more effective strategies. Many express concern that the focus on persuasion techniques represents underlying organizational dysfunction, suggesting that a healthy culture should not revolve around political maneuvering. The debate underscores that while some persuasion might be necessary in team dynamics, prioritizing transparency and direct communication may yield better long-term outcomes for leadership effectiveness and team morale.