The latest revisions to the Kids Online Safety Act have been criticized for inadequately addressing the spectrum of risks that children face online. Despite claims aimed at enhancing child safety, many believe that the Act lacks a comprehensive approach to tackle various forms of online harm. Commenters express skepticism about the true motives behind the legislation, questioning whether the focus is genuinely on protecting children or if there are underlying agendas. Furthermore, the conversation highlights concerns that the Act’s definition of harm is too limited, prompting a call for broader considerations that include emotional and psychological risks.