We Fell Out of Love with Next.js and Back in Love with Ruby on Rails

Viewed 108
The discussion revolves around the shift in preference from modern frameworks like Next.js back to Ruby on Rails, focusing on server-side rendering (SSR) as a core feature gaining renewed appreciation due to its performance benefits. Many users commented on the complexities and risks associated with client-side JavaScript, advocating for a back-to-basics approach that prioritizes HTML and SSR for most applications, especially CRUD interfaces. This shift is partly driven by a desire to streamline workflows and reduce development costs, maximizing efficiency in output while minimizing tech stack complexity. Users also noted the importance of real-world performance metrics when debating frameworks, highlighting a need for practical comparisons to aid in decision-making. Others expressed the sentiment that Rails could improve its competitive edge through better integration with modern frontend technologies, potentially expanding its user base. Overall, there's a growing recognition that not all applications require heavy JavaScript frameworks, leading to a reconsideration of simpler, server-centric technologies.
0 Answers