The discussion focuses on the historical and ongoing debate about the legitimacy and value of computer art as a valid form of artistic expression. Many commenters reflect on how every new medium in art, including oil painting and modern styles, has faced criticism similar to what computer art endures today. Notable instances include the evolution of techniques among artists, showcasing that transitions to new forms often lead to innovative outcomes. The article critiques the notion that computer art does not contribute meaningfully to the art world, with many voices advocating for evolution in art practices rather than stagnation. Some highlight personal struggles in identifying the artist within computerized creations, leading to broader questions of authorship and creativity. This highlights a debate not just about computer art, but about art itself and its continuous evolution.