The discussion revolves around Apple's decision to replace `rsync` with `openrsync` in macOS Sequoia, with mixed reactions from users. Users express confusion regarding the naming, implying that 'openrsync' suggests a lack of open-source status for 'rsync'. Concerns are raised about feature limitations of `openrsync` compared to `rsync`, but there's a general consensus on the benefits of having multiple implementations of the protocol. The debate touches on Apple's apprehension towards GPLv3 due to software patent terms, particularly its implications on compliance. Users show interest in learning more about the remaining GPL-licensed packages in macOS.