The recent antitrust case against Meta (formerly Facebook) has highlighted the aggressive market strategies employed by tech giants. Mark Zuckerberg's own admissions during the case indicate a blatant acknowledgment of his company's intent to neutralize potential competition through acquisitions, raising serious legal and ethical questions. The commentary reveals a larger narrative about how tech leaders, following advice from figures like Peter Thiel, often pursue monopolistic strategies to dominate smaller markets before expanding further. This article suggests that while Zuckerberg's actions reflect a certain level of pragmatism in the tech industry, they also underline the legal risks associated with such maneuvers. Moreover, the comments hint at a broader trend of regulatory scrutiny against major tech companies, particularly in light of the experiences of various FAANG firms, and the potential implications for stakeholders moving forward.