The discussion compares Generative AI (GenAI) to polyester, arguing that while GenAI currently produces generic output similar to synthetic fabrics, it has the potential to revolutionize creative fields if it can overcome its limitations and generate unique outputs. Some comments acknowledge the challenges of GenAI's generic results and emphasize the need for it to tap into more creative algorithms to become revolutionary like photography was in the early 20th century. Others argue against the analogy, suggesting that unlike polyester, GenAI addresses dynamic needs in creative expressions without significant competition from non-AI solutions. Furthermore, there is a socio-economic critique, highlighting how the tech industry has not only created billionaires but has also significantly elevated many workers' incomes, expanding a new upper-middle-class demographic. This shift challenges the notion that AI benefits a select few and emphasizes the broader economic impact of technological advancements.