The article discusses the dynamics of conversations in groups, particularly noting that groups of four facilitate more cohesive and inclusive discussions than larger groups. The commentary references Dunbar’s observation that larger groups tend to split into separate conversations quickly. Several comments highlight personal experiences that reinforce the idea that smaller groups allow for deeper engagement and easier re-entry into discussions. Historical perspectives, such as M.F.K. Fisher's opinions on ideal group sizes for social interactions, support the argument for smaller groups enhancing the quality of social experiences. Additionally, trends in social interaction styles, such as discipline in conversation and the importance of participant engagement, suggest that group compatibility and the nature of the individuals involved are crucial for successful interactions, regardless of group size. Several comments express that, while larger groups can be enjoyable under certain conditions, they often complicate effective communication.