The recent discourse surrounding Signal's security, prompted by a Washington Post article, has sparked considerable debate among users about the platform's vulnerability to state surveillance, particularly with respect to compromised devices rather than the network itself. Comments indicate a nuanced view: while Signal is lauded for its strong cryptographic foundation and effectiveness for the general public, it is acknowledged that the security is context-dependent - particularly for high-stakes conversations. Critics suggest that while Signal is secure as a platform, users cannot assume their devices are free from exploitation, especially in environments where sophisticated spying tools are employed. As such, methodologies for communication must align with the context of the individuals involved and their threat profiles.