The recent deployment of LRAD (Long Range Acoustic Device) technology against protesters in Serbia has drawn significant attention and concern. Acquired in 2022, the use of these military-grade sonic weapons highlights legal ambiguities regarding their application against civilians in Serbia. Critics argue that such technologies, while possibly safer than more lethal means of crowd control, constitute a troubling step towards oppression. Witnesses reported that the sound produced by these devices instilled panic and fear among unarmed demonstrators, with descriptions likening the experience to the intense noise and vibrations of vehicles in peril. The LRAD's potential impact and moral implications raise questions about accountability and the role of foreign suppliers in facilitating governmental control. Comments expressed a strong sentiment against providing oppressive regimes with advanced crowd control technologies, emphasizing a perceived moral responsibility from the supplying countries. Many advocated for alternative, less harmful methods of crowd management, stressing the need for ethics in the vendor-client relationship when it comes to weaponry. Suggestions for counter-measures, such as advanced hearing protection, were also discussed as possible responses to such technology. This situation indicates a pressing global debate about the ethics and legality of using military technologies for domestic law enforcement purposes.