A U.S. District Judge ruled that the broad search of cell tower data, known as a 'tower dump', constitutes an unconstitutional search under the Fourth Amendment. However, due to good faith circumstances, no evidence will be suppressed in this case, hinting at a legal paradox. This ruling does not affect the use of targeted surveillance, like geofencing, which remains permissible, raising concerns about the balance between privacy rights and law enforcement efficacy. The ruling has sparked a debate on the implications of allowing law enforcement to use data deemed unconstitutional without accountability. Critics argue that creating exceptions undermines the rule of law, illustrating a pattern where regulations appear selectively enforced.