The discussion centers around AsciiDoc and how it compares to Markdown for documentation purposes. While some users appreciate AsciiDoc's features and capabilities, others favor Markdown for its simplicity and widespread use. Key points include: - AsciiDoc is seen as a more powerful, structured markup language compared to Markdown, offering richer features for documentation. - Users express mixed feelings about AsciiDoc's usability, with some switching back to Markdown due to its universal adoption across platforms. - The ability to integrate Markdown with systems like MyST indicates a trend towards allowing extensibility within simpler formats. - Some users appreciate AsciiDoc's capabilities for complex documentation while others find it less readable and less interoperable. - The debate highlights the balance between functionality and usability in documentation languages, emphasizing the need for familiarity in a team environment. Overall, the dichotomy between the simplicity of Markdown and the sophistication of AsciiDoc underpins a broader discussion about documentation tools in tech, with each having its strengths depending on the use case.