- **Background**: Pat Gelsinger's term at Intel has drawn mixed reviews. While some praise his acknowledgment of Intel's longstanding issues and efforts to rectify them, others criticize his decisions as detrimental to the company. - **Support for Gelsinger**: Supporters argue that Gelsinger inherited significant challenges, including delays in 10nm production and lost competitive ground to TSMC. They commend his decision to cut dividends and increase investment in fabs across multiple locations, fostering future technological innovations such as the Intel 18A and new partnerships with major companies like Microsoft and Amazon. - **Criticism of Gelsinger**: Critics highlight several failures during his time, including inability to attract AMD, Nvidia, and other key customers, muddled product roadmaps, and excess hiring without corresponding revenue growth. They additionally indicate his neglect of critical GPU development and the failure to react promptly to market shifts during the COVID boom. - **Broader Issues**: A prevailing theme is the dysfunction of Intel’s board, which is perceived as lacking the necessary technical knowledge to drive the company forward effectively. - **Conclusion**: Gelsinger is seen by some as a symbolic leader who took on the blame for a structure deeply rooted in past practices rather than a driving force for innovation and speed. Meanwhile, thoughts about how to regain Intel's leadership position in the tech landscape remain debated, with some advocating for a complete cultural overhaul.