The conversation surrounding the potential addition of Rust to Git has stirred a variety of opinions. Proponents argue that Rust's emphasis on data integrity and correctness could improve Git's infrastructure, given that Rust does not require a runtime environment, making it suitable for integration without necessitating a full rewrite. However, detractors express concerns about potential issues such as increased binary size and the complexity of contributing to a project written in multiple languages. They also question the premise that Rust simplifies coding for less experienced developers, with some users highlighting their personal challenges with the language compared to C++. The debate reflects broader industry trends where Rust is increasingly seen as a replacement for C/C++, though many acknowledge significant gaps still exist in its adoption and practical application in various environments. Moreover, there is a humorous side to the conversation, imagining a parallel project where language models debate such decisions. Finally, while interest in Rust is high, users suggest caution in proceeding if it doesn't present clear advantages over existing technologies.