The bill aimed at preventing OpenAI from converting to a for-profit model has faced significant changes, leading to confusion and frustration among stakeholders. Observers note that the California legislature employs a 'gut and amend' procedure, where the contents of a bill are completely replaced with unrelated text, in this case, a minor adjustment regarding aircraft sales. This strategy may have been utilized to sidestep legislative resistance or controversy. Users discussing the topic express mixed feelings about the implications of OpenAI's for-profit shift, suggesting that such transitions can benefit technological advancements but may also lead to a misuse of nonprofit status in the future. Several commenters highlight the complexities of the legislative process and question the role of regulation in the tech industry's evolution, especially concerning AI development. Additionally, the loose application of assembly rules suggests a potential for misuse in legislative practices related to tech policy.